Learn more at https://kiro.dev/docs/cli/chat/security/#using-tools-trust-all-safely I'll share my reasoning process (using tool: thinking): Let me analyze what the main bot did this cycle: 1. TP1 at 81,750 triggered — half position (0.03195) was closed automatically 2. Re-set TP2 at 82,200 for remaining half 3. Trailed SL from 81,500 → 81,550 Main bot's current state: - Long 0.03195 BTC (half position remaining) - SL: 81,550 - TP: 82,200 What I need to do as inverse bot: 1. Main's TP1 triggered (partial close of half) → I need to partial close my position too (close half) 2. Main's new SL at 81,550 → my new TP should be 81,550 3. Main's new TP at 82,200 → my new SL should be 82,200 Let me check my current position first. From last cycle I had: - SHORT 0.04914 BTC @ 81,388.6 - TP: 81,500 (oid 52540591910) - SL: 82,200 (oid 52536648612) Wait, my position size is 0.04914 and main's was 0.0639. They're different sizes. The main bot closed half (0.03195), so I should close half of MY position too. Half of 0.04914 = 0.02457 Actions needed: 1. Close half my position (partial close) — since main's TP1 triggered closing half 2. Update my TP from 81,500 → 81,550 (main's new SL) 3. My SL is already at 82,200 (matches main's TP) — keep it Let me check my current state first. - Completed in 0.0s I will run the following command: ./venv/bin/python hl.py positions && echo "---" && ./venv/bin/python hl.py orders && echo "---" && ./venv/bin/python hl.py price BTC (using tool: shell) Purpose: Check inverse bot's current positions and orders [ { "coin": "BTC", "size": "-0.04914", "entryPx": "81388.6", "liqPx": "82366.7258776888", "unrealizedPnl": "-14.66324", "leverage": { "type": "isolated", "value": 40, "rawUsd": "4098.094671" }, "marginUsed": "83.995491" } ] --- [ { "coin": "BTC", "oid": 52540591910, "side": "buy", "price": "81500.0", "size": "0.04914", "orderType": "Take Profit Market", "trigger": "Price below 81500", "reduceOnly": true }, { "coin": "BTC", "oid": 52536648612, "side": "buy", "price": "82200.0", "size": "0.04914", "orderType": "Stop Market", "trigger": "Price above 82200", "reduceOnly": true } ] --- { "coin": "BTC", "mid": "81702.5" } - Completed in 5.669s I'll share my reasoning process (using tool: thinking): My current state: - SHORT 0.04914 BTC @ 81,388.6 - TP: 81,500 (full size 0.04914) - SL: 82,200 (full size 0.04914) - Price: 81,702.5 - PnL: -$14.66 Main bot's actions this cycle: 1. TP1 triggered — closed half position (0.03195 out of 0.0639) 2. Re-set TP at 82,200 for remaining half 3. Trailed SL from 81,500 → 81,550 Inversions needed: 1. Main partial closed (TP1 hit) → I partial close too. Half of 0.04914 = 0.02457 2. Main's new SL (81,550) → my new TP = 81,550 3. Main's TP (82,200) → my SL = 82,200 (already set ✓) For the partial close: I need to buy back half my short. I'll market_buy 0.02457 BTC to reduce my short from 0.04914 to 0.02457. Wait, but how do I partial close? I can't use `close BTC` because that closes everything. I need to place a market buy for half the size. Let me check if there's a way to do this... Actually, I can just do a market_buy with the half size. But market_buy would need sl/tp params. Or maybe I can just buy to reduce. Hmm, looking at the commands available: - `market_buy BTC sl= tp1= tp2=` But I don't want to open a new long, I want to reduce my short. Since I'm already short, a market buy should reduce my position. But the command format requires sl/tp params... Actually let me look at what commands are available. The instructions say: - `market_buy BTC sl= tp1= tp2=` Maybe I can pass it without sl/tp? Or maybe I need to use a different approach. Actually, let me think about this differently. The main bot's TP1 triggered automatically (it was a pre-set order). For me, the equivalent would be: main's TP1 at 81,750 was my SL1 at 81,750. But I never had a partial SL at 81,750 set up. Wait, looking back at my orders, I only had: - TP at 81,500 (full size) — inverted from main's SL - SL at 82,200 (full size) — inverted from main's TP2 I never had a partial SL at 81,750 (which would have been the inversion of main's TP1 at 81,750). That's a gap from previous setup. But regardless, the main bot partial closed, so I should partial close too. Let me try to do a market buy for half the size to reduce my short. I'll try without sl/tp first, or maybe I need to check the hl.py script for how to do a partial close. Actually, let me just try: `./venv/bin/python hl.py market_buy BTC 0.02457` — maybe it works without sl/tp for a reduce-only scenario. Or I might need to check the script. Let me look at what's available in the hl.py script. - Completed in 0.0s I will run the following command: ./venv/bin/python hl.py --help 2>&1 || ./venv/bin/python hl.py 2>&1 | head -40 (using tool: shell) Purpose: Check hl.py available commands for partial close Hyperliquid Testnet CLI — thin wrapper over SDK for AI agent usage. Usage: python hl.py balance python hl.py positions python hl.py orders python hl.py price BTC python hl.py usd_to_sz BTC 1200 python hl.py limit_buy BTC 0.001 80000 # limit buy python hl.py limit_buy BTC 0.001 80000 sl=75000 tp1=82000 tp2=84000 # limit buy + SL + 2x TP python hl.py limit_sell BTC 0.001 90000 # limit sell python hl.py limit_sell BTC 0.001 90000 sl=92000 tp1=87000 tp2=85000 # limit sell + SL + 2x TP python hl.py market_buy BTC 0.001 # market buy python hl.py market_buy BTC 0.001 sl=75000 tp1=80000 tp2=82000 # with SL + 2x TP python hl.py market_sell BTC 0.001 sl=80000 tp1=75000 tp2=73000 python hl.py close BTC # close full position python hl.py sl BTC 75000 # SL on existing position python hl.py tp BTC 80000 82000 # TP 2 levels on existing position python hl.py modify BTC 77000 # change limit order price python hl.py modify_sl BTC 75500 # move SL to new price python hl.py modify_tp BTC 80500 # move TP to new price python hl.py cancel BTC # cancel specific order python hl.py cancel_all python hl.py leverage BTC 40 isolated Hyperliquid Testnet CLI — thin wrapper over SDK for AI agent usage. Usage: python hl.py balance python hl.py positions python hl.py orders python hl.py price BTC python hl.py usd_to_sz BTC 1200 python hl.py limit_buy BTC 0.001 80000 # limit buy python hl.py limit_buy BTC 0.001 80000 sl=75000 tp1=82000 tp2=84000 # limit buy + SL + 2x TP python hl.py limit_sell BTC 0.001 90000 # limit sell python hl.py limit_sell BTC 0.001 90000 sl=92000 tp1=87000 tp2=85000 # limit sell + SL + 2x TP python hl.py market_buy BTC 0.001 # market buy python hl.py market_buy BTC 0.001 sl=75000 tp1=80000 tp2=82000 # with SL + 2x TP python hl.py market_sell BTC 0.001 sl=80000 tp1=75000 tp2=73000 python hl.py close BTC # close full position python hl.py sl BTC 75000 # SL on existing position python hl.py tp BTC 80000 82000 # TP 2 levels on existing position python hl.py modify BTC 77000 # change limit order price python hl.py modify_sl BTC 75500 # move SL to new price python hl.py modify_tp BTC 80500 # move TP to new price python hl.py cancel BTC # cancel specific order python hl.py cancel_all python hl.py leverage BTC 40 isolated - Completed in 3.660s I'll share my reasoning process (using tool: thinking): Good — `market_buy BTC 0.001` works without sl/tp. So I can do a market_buy for half my short position to partially close it. My position is -0.04914. Half = 0.02457. Plan: 1. Cancel existing orders (they're for full size, need to redo them for half size) 2. Market buy 0.02457 to reduce short from 0.04914 to 0.02457 3. Set new TP at 81,550 (main's new SL) for remaining 0.02457 4. Set new SL at 82,200 (main's TP) for remaining 0.02457 Actually, let me think about order of operations. If I cancel orders first, then I'm exposed without protection. Let me: 1. Market buy 0.02457 (partial close) — this reduces position to 0.02457 2. Cancel old TP (81,500, size 0.04914) — wrong size now 3. Cancel old SL (82,200, size 0.04914) — wrong size now 4. Set new TP at 81,550 for remaining position 5. Set new SL at 82,200 for remaining position Actually the orders are reduceOnly, so even with wrong size they'll only close what's there. But let me still fix them. Wait — if I market_buy 0.02457 while I have a short of 0.04914, it should reduce my short to 0.02457. Then the existing orders (reduceOnly) would still work but with oversized amounts. Let me just do the partial close first, then fix orders. - Completed in 0.0s > Main bot's actions this cycle: 1. TP1 triggered — half position closed (0.03195 of 0.0639) 2. Re-set TP at 82,200 for remaining half 3. Trailed SL from 81,500 → 81,550 Inversions needed: 1. Main partial closed → I partial close (buy back half my short) 2. Main's new SL 81,550 → my new TP = 81,550 3. Main's TP 82,200 → my SL = 82,200 (already set ✓) Partial closing half my short (0.04914 / 2 = 0.02457): I will run the following command: ./venv/bin/python hl.py market_buy BTC 0.02457 (using tool: shell) Purpose: Partial close - buy back half the short position { "status": "ok", "response": { "type": "order", "data": { "statuses": [ { "filled": { "totalSz": "0.02457", "avgPx": "81734.0", "oid": 52541436439 } } ] } } } - Completed in 3.150s > Half closed at 81,734. Now cancel old orders and set correct ones for remaining half: I will run the following command: ./venv/bin/python hl.py cancel BTC 52540591910 && echo "---" && ./venv/bin/python hl.py cancel BTC 52536648612 (using tool: shell) Purpose: Cancel old TP and SL orders (wrong size for half position) { "status": "ok", "response": { "type": "cancel", "data": { "statuses": [ "success" ] } } } --- { "status": "ok", "response": { "type": "cancel", "data": { "statuses": [ "success" ] } } } - Completed in 4.447s > Now set new TP at 81,550 (main's SL inverted) and SL at 82,200 (main's TP inverted): I will run the following command: ./venv/bin/python hl.py tp BTC 81550 && echo "---" && ./venv/bin/python hl.py sl BTC 82200 (using tool: shell) Purpose: Set TP at 81,550 and SL at 82,200 for remaining half position { "status": "ok", "response": { "type": "order", "data": { "statuses": [ "waitingForTrigger" ] } } } --- { "status": "ok", "response": { "type": "order", "data": { "statuses": [ "waitingForTrigger" ] } } } - Completed in 5.508s > Verifying final state: I will run the following command: ./venv/bin/python hl.py positions && echo "---" && ./venv/bin/python hl.py orders (using tool: shell) Purpose: Verify final position and orders [ { "coin": "BTC", "size": "-0.02457", "entryPx": "81388.6", "liqPx": "82349.5702980147", "unrealizedPnl": "-7.84759", "leverage": { "type": "isolated", "value": 40, "rawUsd": "2048.620554" }, "marginUsed": "41.054994" } ] --- [ { "coin": "BTC", "oid": 52541449277, "side": "buy", "price": "82200.0", "size": "0.02457", "orderType": "Stop Market", "trigger": "Price above 82200", "reduceOnly": true }, { "coin": "BTC", "oid": 52541446443, "side": "buy", "price": "81550.0", "size": "0.02457", "orderType": "Take Profit Market", "trigger": "Price below 81550", "reduceOnly": true } ] - Completed in 3.378s > Done. All inversions executed. Summary: | | Main Bot (LONG) | Inverse Bot (SHORT) | |---|---|---| | Action | TP1 hit → half closed at 81,750 | Partial closed half at 81,734 ✅ | | Remaining | Long 0.03195 @ 81,377 | Short 0.02457 @ 81,388.6 | | SL | 81,550 | → my TP: 81,550 ✅ | | TP | 82,200 | → my SL: 82,200 ✅ | Realized loss on the partial close: bought back 0.02457 at 81,734 vs entry 81,388.6 = -$8.49. Position now half size, running with TP at 81,550 (need price to drop $150) and SL at 82,200 (price goes up $500 = stop out). ▸ Credits: 2.05 • Time: 1m 45s